<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 416 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115576</link>
    <description>Marketability under excise law does not depend on popular tradability in the open market and may exist even where goods are made for a single buyer. In disputes arising from erection and commissioning activity, excisability must be tested by examining the contractual terms, the nature of the work undertaken, and the actual goods produced. Where the record does not show such examination, a finding dropping duty demand and penalty cannot be sustained. The matter must therefore be reconsidered on a proper factual inquiry, and the dispute is remitted for fresh adjudication after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 11:55:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 416 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115576</link>
      <description>Marketability under excise law does not depend on popular tradability in the open market and may exist even where goods are made for a single buyer. In disputes arising from erection and commissioning activity, excisability must be tested by examining the contractual terms, the nature of the work undertaken, and the actual goods produced. Where the record does not show such examination, a finding dropping duty demand and penalty cannot be sustained. The matter must therefore be reconsidered on a proper factual inquiry, and the dispute is remitted for fresh adjudication after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>