<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 412 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115572</link>
    <description>Rule 57J did not expand the quantum of Modvat credit available on inputs sent directly to job workers. The non obstante clause in Rule 57J only permitted credit for such inputs and did not displace the limitation under Notification No. 5/94-C.E., as amended, restricting credit to 95% of the duty paid on eligible inputs. Rule 57A continued to govern the duties eligible for credit, so the prescribed cap remained applicable. Full credit beyond that limit was therefore unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 11:36:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 412 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115572</link>
      <description>Rule 57J did not expand the quantum of Modvat credit available on inputs sent directly to job workers. The non obstante clause in Rule 57J only permitted credit for such inputs and did not displace the limitation under Notification No. 5/94-C.E., as amended, restricting credit to 95% of the duty paid on eligible inputs. Rule 57A continued to govern the duties eligible for credit, so the prescribed cap remained applicable. Full credit beyond that limit was therefore unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>