https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115571 The Tribunal dismissed the Request for Oral Modification (ROM) application seeking the re-call of a Final Order that modified orders related to shortages of lead ingots. The Tribunal held that the alleged contradictions in the impugned order did not amount to a mistake apparent on the face of the record. It emphasized that the scope of ROM was limited to correcting typographical or other obvious mistakes, not re-evaluating factual findings. Therefore, the ROM application was dismissed, affirming the Final Order modifying the orders concerning the lead ingot shortages. en-us Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 May 2012 11:35:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115571 The Tribunal dismissed the Request for Oral Modification (ROM) application seeking the re-call of a Final Order that modified orders related to shortages of lead ingots. The Tribunal held that the alleged contradictions in the impugned order did not amount to a mistake apparent on the face of the record. It emphasized that the scope of ROM was limited to correcting typographical or other obvious mistakes, not re-evaluating factual findings. Therefore, the ROM application was dismissed, affirming the Final Order modifying the orders concerning the lead ingot shortages. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115571