<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 370 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115559</link>
    <description>A refund of interest paid under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 was held not maintainable after the dispute had been settled and concluded under the statutory scheme. The settlement was treated as final, so neither party could reopen the closed matter to seek additional monetary relief. On that basis, the refund claim was rejected and the appeal dismissal was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 10:06:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 370 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115559</link>
      <description>A refund of interest paid under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 was held not maintainable after the dispute had been settled and concluded under the statutory scheme. The settlement was treated as final, so neither party could reopen the closed matter to seek additional monetary relief. On that basis, the refund claim was rejected and the appeal dismissal was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>