<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 367 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115556</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that duty demands on the manufacturing of &#039;fin tubes&#039; and &#039;bend tubes&#039; without payment of duty, as well as the duty demand on improper accounting of raw materials, were not sustainable. Consequently, the penalties and interest associated with the demands were also deemed unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant, granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 18:43:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 367 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115556</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that duty demands on the manufacturing of &#039;fin tubes&#039; and &#039;bend tubes&#039; without payment of duty, as well as the duty demand on improper accounting of raw materials, were not sustainable. Consequently, the penalties and interest associated with the demands were also deemed unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant, granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>