<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 357 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115546</link>
    <description>Duty based on entries in private records can be sustained only to the extent those entries are corroborated by reliable evidence; the demand was therefore re-quantified on the corroborated quantity, with abatement from sale price in computing assessable value. Penalty under Section 11AC could not apply for a period before the provision came into force, and a composite penalty imposed without separating liability under distinct provisions was unsustainable; that penalty was set aside. The redemption fines were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 17:56:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 357 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115546</link>
      <description>Duty based on entries in private records can be sustained only to the extent those entries are corroborated by reliable evidence; the demand was therefore re-quantified on the corroborated quantity, with abatement from sale price in computing assessable value. Penalty under Section 11AC could not apply for a period before the provision came into force, and a composite penalty imposed without separating liability under distinct provisions was unsustainable; that penalty was set aside. The redemption fines were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>