<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 425 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115543</link>
    <description>A Customs House Agent licence suspension was found unsustainable where the alleged irregularities in shipping bills were relied on long after the events, without a satisfactory explanation for the delay or a clear nexus between the misconduct alleged and the date of suspension. A mere doubt about the genuineness of an address was held insufficient to justify such a serious coercive step. The suspension could not be sustained as a positive measure in the absence of adequate reasons, and the order was revoked and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 17:43:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 425 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115543</link>
      <description>A Customs House Agent licence suspension was found unsustainable where the alleged irregularities in shipping bills were relied on long after the events, without a satisfactory explanation for the delay or a clear nexus between the misconduct alleged and the date of suspension. A mere doubt about the genuineness of an address was held insufficient to justify such a serious coercive step. The suspension could not be sustained as a positive measure in the absence of adequate reasons, and the order was revoked and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>