<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 417 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Jaipur, allowing the appeals due to discrepancies in demand confirmation, jurisdictional conflicts between Customs authorities and DGFT, and the interpretation of the Supreme Court judgment regarding misrepresentations in advance licenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 417 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Jaipur, allowing the appeals due to discrepancies in demand confirmation, jurisdictional conflicts between Customs authorities and DGFT, and the interpretation of the Supreme Court judgment regarding misrepresentations in advance licenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>