<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 338 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115483</link>
    <description>Extended limitation for central excise duty requires suppression when the department had no prior knowledge of the relevant movements or procedure. Numbered movement documents, departmental inspections and contemporaneous correspondence may negate suppression. Duty liability for inter-unit goods depends on proof of marketability, manufacturer status, related-person relationship, applicable exemption and any clandestine removal; non-compliance with procedural requirements alone does not establish liability. Where duty demand fails on limitation and merits, consequential confiscation and penalty lack an independent basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 10:20:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 338 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115483</link>
      <description>Extended limitation for central excise duty requires suppression when the department had no prior knowledge of the relevant movements or procedure. Numbered movement documents, departmental inspections and contemporaneous correspondence may negate suppression. Duty liability for inter-unit goods depends on proof of marketability, manufacturer status, related-person relationship, applicable exemption and any clandestine removal; non-compliance with procedural requirements alone does not establish liability. Where duty demand fails on limitation and merits, consequential confiscation and penalty lack an independent basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>