<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 328 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115473</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision confirming a differential demand of Excise duty on goods produced by a 100% Export Oriented Undertaking (EOU). The appellants were required to pay the duty amount not less than the excise duty leviable on like goods produced outside the EOU, resulting in a differential demand of Rs. 14,49,718.96. Despite receiving notices, the appellants did not appear at the hearing. The Tribunal supported the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision based on the clear language of the relevant notifications, emphasizing the importance of compliance with duty payment requirements for EOUs to avoid such demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 18:16:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 328 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115473</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision confirming a differential demand of Excise duty on goods produced by a 100% Export Oriented Undertaking (EOU). The appellants were required to pay the duty amount not less than the excise duty leviable on like goods produced outside the EOU, resulting in a differential demand of Rs. 14,49,718.96. Despite receiving notices, the appellants did not appear at the hearing. The Tribunal supported the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision based on the clear language of the relevant notifications, emphasizing the importance of compliance with duty payment requirements for EOUs to avoid such demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>