<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 322 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115467</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner&#039;s failure to issue a show cause notice to the appellant implied a waiver of the action against the appellant. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the legal position on the waiver of show cause action against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 18:03:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 322 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115467</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner&#039;s failure to issue a show cause notice to the appellant implied a waiver of the action against the appellant. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the legal position on the waiver of show cause action against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>