<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 411 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115460</link>
    <description>A demand for clandestine removal of cotton yarn cannot be sustained without a complete and reliable evidentiary chain, including proof of recovery of the relied-upon record, supporting seizure documents, and credible linkage to the assessee; on that basis, the duty demand and penalty were set aside. By contrast, admitted excess unaccounted stock of excisable goods is liable to confiscation, and a redemption fine may be upheld where the explanation for non-accountal is belated and the fine is not shown to be unreasonable. The dispute thus resulted in partial relief, with the assessee succeeding only on the demand and penalty component.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 17:42:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 411 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115460</link>
      <description>A demand for clandestine removal of cotton yarn cannot be sustained without a complete and reliable evidentiary chain, including proof of recovery of the relied-upon record, supporting seizure documents, and credible linkage to the assessee; on that basis, the duty demand and penalty were set aside. By contrast, admitted excess unaccounted stock of excisable goods is liable to confiscation, and a redemption fine may be upheld where the explanation for non-accountal is belated and the fine is not shown to be unreasonable. The dispute thus resulted in partial relief, with the assessee succeeding only on the demand and penalty component.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>