<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 405 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115454</link>
    <description>The appeal was successful as the court set aside the impugned order denying duty remission on Denatured Ethyl Alcohol lost due to evaporation. The court found that immediate notification of loss within 48 hours was not required for gradual losses like evaporation, as mandated only for sudden causes such as fire. The appellants had consistently reported the loss within prescribed limits through RT 12 returns, justifying their entitlement to duty remission. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and appropriate relief was granted in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 17:23:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 405 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115454</link>
      <description>The appeal was successful as the court set aside the impugned order denying duty remission on Denatured Ethyl Alcohol lost due to evaporation. The court found that immediate notification of loss within 48 hours was not required for gradual losses like evaporation, as mandated only for sudden causes such as fire. The appellants had consistently reported the loss within prescribed limits through RT 12 returns, justifying their entitlement to duty remission. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and appropriate relief was granted in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>