<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 394 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115443</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld that the refund claim was affected by unjust enrichment, leading to the remittance of the amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund. Due to the lack of evidence supporting the appellant&#039;s claim of non-recovery of duty from customers, the Tribunal affirmed the lower authorities&#039; decision, dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 16:45:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 394 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115443</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld that the refund claim was affected by unjust enrichment, leading to the remittance of the amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund. Due to the lack of evidence supporting the appellant&#039;s claim of non-recovery of duty from customers, the Tribunal affirmed the lower authorities&#039; decision, dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>