https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115429 The court set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant. The appellant, facing Central Excise duty demands, penalties, and interest for availing Modvat credit, successfully challenged the demands imposed by the department. The court found the credit ineligibility in four cases to be incorrect, remanding three cases for reconsideration and allowing the appeal in one case. Additionally, the correctness of debit entries in RG 23A registers and the permissibility of duty deposits from the Modvat account were upheld, leading to the reversal of the impugned order in favor of the appellant. en-us Mon, 05 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 May 2012 16:05:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115429 The court set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant. The appellant, facing Central Excise duty demands, penalties, and interest for availing Modvat credit, successfully challenged the demands imposed by the department. The court found the credit ineligibility in four cases to be incorrect, remanding three cases for reconsideration and allowing the appeal in one case. Additionally, the correctness of debit entries in RG 23A registers and the permissibility of duty deposits from the Modvat account were upheld, leading to the reversal of the impugned order in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115429