<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 605 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115425</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order imposing penalties under Section 112 of the Customs Act on the appellants for possession of counterfeit currency notes, confirming that they knowingly purchased and possessed fake currency notes, causing harm to the economy and state security. The appeals were dismissed on 16-3-2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:55:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 605 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115425</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order imposing penalties under Section 112 of the Customs Act on the appellants for possession of counterfeit currency notes, confirming that they knowingly purchased and possessed fake currency notes, causing harm to the economy and state security. The appeals were dismissed on 16-3-2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>