<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 540 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115418</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the entitlement of the respondents to the Small Scale Exemption Notification benefit for branded goods they manufactured. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as they failed to prove that the goods were not branded, with evidence showing the goods were cleared with logos and specific part numbers as per customer demand. The judgment underscores the importance of providing substantial evidence in cases involving tax benefits and exemptions, emphasizing the need for concrete proof to support claims related to branding and eligibility for exemptions under specific notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:32:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 540 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115418</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the entitlement of the respondents to the Small Scale Exemption Notification benefit for branded goods they manufactured. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as they failed to prove that the goods were not branded, with evidence showing the goods were cleared with logos and specific part numbers as per customer demand. The judgment underscores the importance of providing substantial evidence in cases involving tax benefits and exemptions, emphasizing the need for concrete proof to support claims related to branding and eligibility for exemptions under specific notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>