<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 412 - CESTAT, , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115414</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty after finding that Russia was correctly classified as a non-market economy. The authority&#039;s reliance on domestic industry data for determining normal value and export price was justified due to the appellant&#039;s incomplete responses. The Tribunal affirmed that significant dumping had caused injury to the domestic industry, justifying the imposition of the duty. The Central Government&#039;s acceptance of the authority&#039;s findings led to the imposition of definitive anti-dumping duty, which was upheld by the Tribunal, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 14:58:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 412 - CESTAT, , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115414</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty after finding that Russia was correctly classified as a non-market economy. The authority&#039;s reliance on domestic industry data for determining normal value and export price was justified due to the appellant&#039;s incomplete responses. The Tribunal affirmed that significant dumping had caused injury to the domestic industry, justifying the imposition of the duty. The Central Government&#039;s acceptance of the authority&#039;s findings led to the imposition of definitive anti-dumping duty, which was upheld by the Tribunal, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>