https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115407 The appellants' request for re-export of goods was rejected due to the goods acquiring the character of warehoused goods and the objection from the importers, who were found to have diverted duty-free imported goods into the local market. The adjudicating authority determined that the title of the goods belonged to the importers, not the appellants. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and the original order was affirmed, with the goods deemed liable to confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962. en-us Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 May 2012 13:37:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115407 The appellants' request for re-export of goods was rejected due to the goods acquiring the character of warehoused goods and the objection from the importers, who were found to have diverted duty-free imported goods into the local market. The adjudicating authority determined that the title of the goods belonged to the importers, not the appellants. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and the original order was affirmed, with the goods deemed liable to confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115407