https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115400 The Tribunal set aside the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellants for failing to obtain the inspector's signature on commercial invoices and AR-4s before exporting goods to China. It was determined that the appellants did not intend to clear the goods domestically, and the inspector's deliberate omission was the primary cause of the issue. As the goods were destined for export and had already been sealed by the inspector, confiscation and penalty were deemed unwarranted. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, citing relevant judgments and emphasizing the absence of deliberate wrongdoing on their part. en-us Mon, 06 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 May 2012 13:21:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115400 The Tribunal set aside the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellants for failing to obtain the inspector's signature on commercial invoices and AR-4s before exporting goods to China. It was determined that the appellants did not intend to clear the goods domestically, and the inspector's deliberate omission was the primary cause of the issue. As the goods were destined for export and had already been sealed by the inspector, confiscation and penalty were deemed unwarranted. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, citing relevant judgments and emphasizing the absence of deliberate wrongdoing on their part. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115400