<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 393 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115395</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 was dismissed. The penalties of Rs. 78,500 under Section 76 for delayed service tax payment and Rs. 1000 under Section 77 were upheld. The appellants failed to prove a reasonable cause for the payment delay, as delays were attributed to internal operational issues rather than customer tax realization delays. Consequently, the penalties imposed by lower authorities were maintained due to lack of evidence supporting the appellants&#039; claims, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 13:08:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 393 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115395</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 was dismissed. The penalties of Rs. 78,500 under Section 76 for delayed service tax payment and Rs. 1000 under Section 77 were upheld. The appellants failed to prove a reasonable cause for the payment delay, as delays were attributed to internal operational issues rather than customer tax realization delays. Consequently, the penalties imposed by lower authorities were maintained due to lack of evidence supporting the appellants&#039; claims, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>