<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 387 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115389</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the stay application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty in a case involving different MRPs for Kinley soda cleared from different factories. The Tribunal found that Section 4A of the Central Excise Act applied only when different prices were declared on the same goods manufactured in the same factory, not across different factories. Duty and penalty were waived unconditionally.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 12:40:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 387 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115389</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the stay application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty in a case involving different MRPs for Kinley soda cleared from different factories. The Tribunal found that Section 4A of the Central Excise Act applied only when different prices were declared on the same goods manufactured in the same factory, not across different factories. Duty and penalty were waived unconditionally.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>