<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 372 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115374</link>
    <description>Transitional Modvat credit under Rule 57H cannot be denied solely because duplicate invoice copies are unavailable when the original invoices are produced and receipt, duty payment, and use of inputs are undisputed. The note treats the missing duplicate copies as a technical defect, not a substantive bar to credit. It also states that personal penalty is not justified where the claim concerns transitional credit only and no deliberate contravention is established. On that basis, the impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 11:02:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 372 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115374</link>
      <description>Transitional Modvat credit under Rule 57H cannot be denied solely because duplicate invoice copies are unavailable when the original invoices are produced and receipt, duty payment, and use of inputs are undisputed. The note treats the missing duplicate copies as a technical defect, not a substantive bar to credit. It also states that personal penalty is not justified where the claim concerns transitional credit only and no deliberate contravention is established. On that basis, the impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>