<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 372 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115374</link>
    <description>Transitional Modvat credit under Rule 57H was available despite non-production of duplicate invoice copies where original invoices established receipt of inputs, duty payment and use in the factory. The missing duplicate copies constituted a technical documentation defect because credit had not been availed when the inputs were received. Personal penalty was unwarranted for a transitional-credit claim in the absence of deliberate contravention; an inadmissible claim, if any, should be rejected rather than penalised. The denial of credit and equal penalty were therefore unsustainable, with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 11:02:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 372 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115374</link>
      <description>Transitional Modvat credit under Rule 57H was available despite non-production of duplicate invoice copies where original invoices established receipt of inputs, duty payment and use in the factory. The missing duplicate copies constituted a technical documentation defect because credit had not been availed when the inputs were received. Personal penalty was unwarranted for a transitional-credit claim in the absence of deliberate contravention; an inadmissible claim, if any, should be rejected rather than penalised. The denial of credit and equal penalty were therefore unsustainable, with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>