<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 370 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115372</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI upheld the demand of service tax on commission paid to brokers for clearing and forwarding services, amounting to Rs. 2,05,382/- for the period July 1997 to March 1998. A penalty of Rs. 2,31,902/- was also imposed on the appellants. The Tribunal found that the service provided by the brokers fell within the definition of a &quot;Clearing and Forwarding Agent&quot; under Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994, based on similarities with a previous case involving service tax on commission paid to agents for procuring orders. The appellants were directed to pre-deposit 50% of the tax dues within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 10:50:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 370 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115372</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI upheld the demand of service tax on commission paid to brokers for clearing and forwarding services, amounting to Rs. 2,05,382/- for the period July 1997 to March 1998. A penalty of Rs. 2,31,902/- was also imposed on the appellants. The Tribunal found that the service provided by the brokers fell within the definition of a &quot;Clearing and Forwarding Agent&quot; under Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994, based on similarities with a previous case involving service tax on commission paid to agents for procuring orders. The appellants were directed to pre-deposit 50% of the tax dues within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>