https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115369 The Tribunal allowed the appeal without pre-deposit of duty and penalty, but held the 100% EOU liable for duty payment on exported goods due to lack of proof of export. It directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to assess the appellant's eligibility for exemption under Notification 15/2002, emphasizing compliance with its conditions. The case was remanded for further consideration to ensure a thorough evaluation of the exemption claim. en-us Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 May 2012 10:27:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115369 The Tribunal allowed the appeal without pre-deposit of duty and penalty, but held the 100% EOU liable for duty payment on exported goods due to lack of proof of export. It directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to assess the appellant's eligibility for exemption under Notification 15/2002, emphasizing compliance with its conditions. The case was remanded for further consideration to ensure a thorough evaluation of the exemption claim. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115369