<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 372 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115342</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai waived the pre-deposit of penalty of Rs. 1 Lakh imposed on the Vice-President of M/s. Motorol Speciality Oils Ltd. The Tribunal found that Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 did not apply as the applicant had not dealt with any excisable goods, leading to the penalty imposition being unjustified. Therefore, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of penalty and stayed the recovery pending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 12:37:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 372 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115342</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai waived the pre-deposit of penalty of Rs. 1 Lakh imposed on the Vice-President of M/s. Motorol Speciality Oils Ltd. The Tribunal found that Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 did not apply as the applicant had not dealt with any excisable goods, leading to the penalty imposition being unjustified. Therefore, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of penalty and stayed the recovery pending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>