<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 363 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115332</link>
    <description>Rule 4(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules allows only 50% credit on capital goods in the first financial year, with the balance available later. Where an assessee took the full credit within one year but reversed the excess after the objection was raised, denial of credit was held unsustainable and the consequential penalty could not survive. The disputed credit was therefore restored and the penalty set aside on the same footing as the underlying demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:58:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 363 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115332</link>
      <description>Rule 4(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules allows only 50% credit on capital goods in the first financial year, with the balance available later. Where an assessee took the full credit within one year but reversed the excess after the objection was raised, denial of credit was held unsustainable and the consequential penalty could not survive. The disputed credit was therefore restored and the penalty set aside on the same footing as the underlying demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>