<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 358 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the transaction value for customs duty assessment due to insufficient evidence of a purely commercial price unaffected by the relationship between the parties. However, it found no misdeclaration of goods and deemed the confiscation and penalty imposition unwarranted. Therefore, the order related to confiscation and penalty imposition was set aside, and the appeal was partly allowed on this basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:46:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 358 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the transaction value for customs duty assessment due to insufficient evidence of a purely commercial price unaffected by the relationship between the parties. However, it found no misdeclaration of goods and deemed the confiscation and penalty imposition unwarranted. Therefore, the order related to confiscation and penalty imposition was set aside, and the appeal was partly allowed on this basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>