<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 598 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115321</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found sufficient compliance with Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, for the waiver of remaining amounts and ordered the stay of recovery. It also highlighted the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s duplicity in conduct, setting aside the detention notice issued under Section 142 and recommending appropriate action to maintain Customs service integrity. Both parties were granted liberty to file an early hearing application, which was disposed of as per the judgment&#039;s terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 10:51:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 598 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115321</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found sufficient compliance with Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, for the waiver of remaining amounts and ordered the stay of recovery. It also highlighted the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s duplicity in conduct, setting aside the detention notice issued under Section 142 and recommending appropriate action to maintain Customs service integrity. Both parties were granted liberty to file an early hearing application, which was disposed of as per the judgment&#039;s terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>