<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 596 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115319</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. could not be denied for clearances from one factory merely because the same manufacturer availed Modvat credit in another distinct factory. The notification was read as allowing clearances from one or more factories for computing the value of clearances, and that wording did not prohibit exemption in one unit alongside credit availment in another. Applying the earlier Tribunal view relied on in the discussion, the existence of Modvat credit in the second unit did not affect eligibility for exemption in the first unit, and the assessee was entitled to succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 10:45:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 596 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115319</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. could not be denied for clearances from one factory merely because the same manufacturer availed Modvat credit in another distinct factory. The notification was read as allowing clearances from one or more factories for computing the value of clearances, and that wording did not prohibit exemption in one unit alongside credit availment in another. Applying the earlier Tribunal view relied on in the discussion, the existence of Modvat credit in the second unit did not affect eligibility for exemption in the first unit, and the assessee was entitled to succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>