<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 591 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115314</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 114(A) of the Customs Act on the appellants&#039; company, ordering a refund. However, the penalty imposed on the Managing Director under Section 112(a) and (b) of the Customs Act was upheld. The Tribunal found the penalty on the company to be illegal as it did not fall under the specified conditions of Section 114(A), while the penalty on the Managing Director for improper importation of goods was deemed appropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:57:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 591 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115314</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 114(A) of the Customs Act on the appellants&#039; company, ordering a refund. However, the penalty imposed on the Managing Director under Section 112(a) and (b) of the Customs Act was upheld. The Tribunal found the penalty on the company to be illegal as it did not fall under the specified conditions of Section 114(A), while the penalty on the Managing Director for improper importation of goods was deemed appropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>