<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 451 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115299</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the impugned order unsustainable due to lack of evidence and set it aside. The appeal was allowed as the classification issue was wrongly decided without proper evidence linking the imported goods to the micro assembly in the calculator examined by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:41:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 451 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115299</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the impugned order unsustainable due to lack of evidence and set it aside. The appeal was allowed as the classification issue was wrongly decided without proper evidence linking the imported goods to the micro assembly in the calculator examined by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>