https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115270 In stay proceedings, the Tribunal held that the applicant had shown a strong prima facie case for interim protection and was entitled to unconditional waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. It relied on the Supreme Court ruling in International Auto Ltd. to note that non-adoption of Rule 57F(4) at the time of clearance could not, by itself, justify denial of relief. The limitation objection was noted, but the operative basis for relief remained the strength of the prima facie case on the materials placed before the Tribunal. en-us Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 May 2012 13:14:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115270 In stay proceedings, the Tribunal held that the applicant had shown a strong prima facie case for interim protection and was entitled to unconditional waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. It relied on the Supreme Court ruling in International Auto Ltd. to note that non-adoption of Rule 57F(4) at the time of clearance could not, by itself, justify denial of relief. The limitation objection was noted, but the operative basis for relief remained the strength of the prima facie case on the materials placed before the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115270