<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 581 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the exporters, setting aside the overvaluation findings and ordering the payment of full drawback based on the declared values. The Tribunal accepted the appellants&#039; justifications for higher export prices due to fabric quality and branding, noting discrepancies in purchase prices and export prices were not substantial. It emphasized the need for thorough verification before drawing conclusions and acknowledged the potential impact of delays in the investigation process. Comparing T-shirts with Polo shirts was deemed inappropriate due to inherent differences, leading to the decision in favor of the exporters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:20:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 581 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the exporters, setting aside the overvaluation findings and ordering the payment of full drawback based on the declared values. The Tribunal accepted the appellants&#039; justifications for higher export prices due to fabric quality and branding, noting discrepancies in purchase prices and export prices were not substantial. It emphasized the need for thorough verification before drawing conclusions and acknowledged the potential impact of delays in the investigation process. Comparing T-shirts with Polo shirts was deemed inappropriate due to inherent differences, leading to the decision in favor of the exporters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>