<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 572 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115236</link>
    <description>The court granted a stay on the recovery of the disputed service tax amount of Rs. 24,337, finding a prima facie case in favor of the appellants. The dispute arose from the calculation of service tax on advertisement commission, with the appellants arguing that they correctly paid tax on the agency commission component only, as per a circular from the Advertising Agencies Association of India. The recovery was stayed pending a final hearing scheduled for 13-7-2005, based on the judge&#039;s assessment of the submissions made during the hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:26:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 572 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115236</link>
      <description>The court granted a stay on the recovery of the disputed service tax amount of Rs. 24,337, finding a prima facie case in favor of the appellants. The dispute arose from the calculation of service tax on advertisement commission, with the appellants arguing that they correctly paid tax on the agency commission component only, as per a circular from the Advertising Agencies Association of India. The recovery was stayed pending a final hearing scheduled for 13-7-2005, based on the judge&#039;s assessment of the submissions made during the hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>