https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115224 The Tribunal dismissed the application for recall of the final order, upholding its decision that there was no mistake of fact or law in the classification of goods in dispute. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to proceed with deciding the classification issue and duty liability of the respondents, emphasizing that the pending issue before the adjudicating authority did not prevent addressing this matter separately. The Tribunal found no prejudice to the respondents and affirmed that the impugned final order stood valid. en-us Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 May 2012 18:02:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115224 The Tribunal dismissed the application for recall of the final order, upholding its decision that there was no mistake of fact or law in the classification of goods in dispute. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to proceed with deciding the classification issue and duty liability of the respondents, emphasizing that the pending issue before the adjudicating authority did not prevent addressing this matter separately. The Tribunal found no prejudice to the respondents and affirmed that the impugned final order stood valid. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115224