<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 558 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the service tax demand on &quot;Engineering Consultancy&quot; under a technical agreement with a foreign company. It ruled that during the period of dispute before the relevant amendment, service recipients in India were not liable to pay service tax to a non-resident service provider. The Tribunal referenced a precedent and held that the provision allowing service tax on recipients was not retrospective. Consequently, the demand for service tax and associated penalties were dismissed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 558 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the service tax demand on &quot;Engineering Consultancy&quot; under a technical agreement with a foreign company. It ruled that during the period of dispute before the relevant amendment, service recipients in India were not liable to pay service tax to a non-resident service provider. The Tribunal referenced a precedent and held that the provision allowing service tax on recipients was not retrospective. Consequently, the demand for service tax and associated penalties were dismissed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>