<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 639 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order due to procedural and legal flaws in the valuation and confiscation process. The Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence of contemporaneous imports and proper legal basis for valuation adjustments and confiscation actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:26:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 639 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order due to procedural and legal flaws in the valuation and confiscation process. The Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence of contemporaneous imports and proper legal basis for valuation adjustments and confiscation actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>