https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115209 The Tribunal rejected the appeals, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) order disallowing interest on the deposit made pending appeal. The decision was based on the understanding that Section 11B and 11BB do not apply to deposits under Section 35F, as they are considered security deposits, not duty payments. The Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the Commissioner's decision, as no arguments were presented to challenge the established legal reasoning. en-us Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 May 2012 17:13:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115209 The Tribunal rejected the appeals, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) order disallowing interest on the deposit made pending appeal. The decision was based on the understanding that Section 11B and 11BB do not apply to deposits under Section 35F, as they are considered security deposits, not duty payments. The Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the Commissioner's decision, as no arguments were presented to challenge the established legal reasoning. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115209