<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 535 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115161</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with directions to re-determine the duty on the Incoloy steel plates as per the project rate. The confiscation and duty demands on the containers were set aside as duty had already been paid on the entire packing cost, including the cost of hiring containers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:17:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 535 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115161</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with directions to re-determine the duty on the Incoloy steel plates as per the project rate. The confiscation and duty demands on the containers were set aside as duty had already been paid on the entire packing cost, including the cost of hiring containers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>