<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 507 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered the re-fixation of the redemption fine based on market prices and legal considerations. The Commissioner reduced the fine from Rs. 10 Lakhs to Rs. 7.25 Lakhs, but the appellant argued it was excessive, citing a comparison with domestic prices. The appellant claimed ignorance of the Floor Price Notification issued just before LC renewal. The Commissioner&#039;s imposition of the fine was supported, noting the import price did not exceed the market price minus customs duty. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 50,000 under Section 125 of the Customs Act due to the appellant&#039;s regular imports and profit margin.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:41:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 507 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered the re-fixation of the redemption fine based on market prices and legal considerations. The Commissioner reduced the fine from Rs. 10 Lakhs to Rs. 7.25 Lakhs, but the appellant argued it was excessive, citing a comparison with domestic prices. The appellant claimed ignorance of the Floor Price Notification issued just before LC renewal. The Commissioner&#039;s imposition of the fine was supported, noting the import price did not exceed the market price minus customs duty. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 50,000 under Section 125 of the Customs Act due to the appellant&#039;s regular imports and profit margin.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>