<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 549 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115143</link>
    <description>Notification No. 9/2001, as amended by Notification No. 47/2001-C.E., required clearances of goods falling under Heading 93.06 made between 1 April 2001 and 30 September 2001 to be included when computing the aggregate value of clearances for small scale exemption. The amended proviso to paragraph 3 expressly treated those home-consumption clearances as part of the nil-rate computation for financial year 2001-2002, showing a change in the method of calculation rather than an impermissible retrospective levy. On that basis, the clearances were rightly counted for exemption purposes and the duty demand was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:14:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 549 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115143</link>
      <description>Notification No. 9/2001, as amended by Notification No. 47/2001-C.E., required clearances of goods falling under Heading 93.06 made between 1 April 2001 and 30 September 2001 to be included when computing the aggregate value of clearances for small scale exemption. The amended proviso to paragraph 3 expressly treated those home-consumption clearances as part of the nil-rate computation for financial year 2001-2002, showing a change in the method of calculation rather than an impermissible retrospective levy. On that basis, the clearances were rightly counted for exemption purposes and the duty demand was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>