<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 587 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115142</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, rejecting the retrospective application of Notification No. 35/98-Cus. dated 13-06-1998 and upholding the duty payment at the rate applicable at the time of clearance. The decision emphasized the significance of proper interpretation of customs notifications and adherence to legal provisions, denying the importer&#039;s claim for a refund of the excess duty paid at the higher rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:58:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 587 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115142</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, rejecting the retrospective application of Notification No. 35/98-Cus. dated 13-06-1998 and upholding the duty payment at the rate applicable at the time of clearance. The decision emphasized the significance of proper interpretation of customs notifications and adherence to legal provisions, denying the importer&#039;s claim for a refund of the excess duty paid at the higher rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>