<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 325 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115133</link>
    <description>Eligibility for concession under Notification 7/2003 was accepted for a process treated as similar to scouring, with the CESTAT finding merit in the appellant&#039;s claim. On that basis, pre-deposit was waived and recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal. The operative point is that the tribunal recognised the claimed concession eligibility for the disputed process and granted interim protection pending final adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:09:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 325 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115133</link>
      <description>Eligibility for concession under Notification 7/2003 was accepted for a process treated as similar to scouring, with the CESTAT finding merit in the appellant&#039;s claim. On that basis, pre-deposit was waived and recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal. The operative point is that the tribunal recognised the claimed concession eligibility for the disputed process and granted interim protection pending final adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>