<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 505 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115131</link>
    <description>The appeal seeking to set aside the Order-in-Original passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi as it had actually been passed by the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise and had already merged with the order-in-appeal. The appeal was deemed not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:57:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 505 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115131</link>
      <description>The appeal seeking to set aside the Order-in-Original passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi as it had actually been passed by the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise and had already merged with the order-in-appeal. The appeal was deemed not maintainable and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>