<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 547 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115122</link>
    <description>Departmental tariff classification was determined by reference to Vadodara Collectorate Trade Notice No. 249/86, which listed eligible parts and accessories of air-conditioning or refrigerating machinery and excluded specified items. Receivers, surge drums, flash vessels, oil separator and drain pot were treated as storage vessels without tubes and, on the admitted facts, fell within the excluded category or otherwise within the notice&#039;s exclusion list. Base frames were also treated as falling within the entry for base, stand or frame of iron and steel. The clarification governed classification, the assessee received its benefit, and the goods were not classifiable under sub-headings 8415.00, 8418.00 or 8419.00; the Revenue challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:09:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 547 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115122</link>
      <description>Departmental tariff classification was determined by reference to Vadodara Collectorate Trade Notice No. 249/86, which listed eligible parts and accessories of air-conditioning or refrigerating machinery and excluded specified items. Receivers, surge drums, flash vessels, oil separator and drain pot were treated as storage vessels without tubes and, on the admitted facts, fell within the excluded category or otherwise within the notice&#039;s exclusion list. Base frames were also treated as falling within the entry for base, stand or frame of iron and steel. The clarification governed classification, the assessee received its benefit, and the goods were not classifiable under sub-headings 8415.00, 8418.00 or 8419.00; the Revenue challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>