<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 533 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115108</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under erstwhile Rule 57Q was admissible on air-conditioners used to maintain the temperature of electronic equipment, because they were not used for office premises and served an input-related function for the equipment. The later exclusion of air-conditioners from Rule 57Q, effective from 23-7-1996, could not be applied retrospectively to deny credit for the earlier period. The denial based on retrospective operation of the amendment was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:08:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 533 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115108</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under erstwhile Rule 57Q was admissible on air-conditioners used to maintain the temperature of electronic equipment, because they were not used for office premises and served an input-related function for the equipment. The later exclusion of air-conditioners from Rule 57Q, effective from 23-7-1996, could not be applied retrospectively to deny credit for the earlier period. The denial based on retrospective operation of the amendment was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>