https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115101 The Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal by CEGAT for non-prosecution and the rejection of the restoration application. Despite multiple opportunities and notices, the appellant failed to prosecute the appeal, leading to dismissal. The Court found no valid grounds for restoration, emphasizing the lack of sufficient cause and the appellant's failure to take advantage of indulgences granted by the Tribunal. Blaming the lawyer for non-appearance was deemed insufficient, and the Court supported the Tribunal's decision based on sound discretion. The petition challenging the dismissal and refusal to restore the appeal was ultimately dismissed. en-us Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 May 2012 17:28:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115101 The Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal by CEGAT for non-prosecution and the rejection of the restoration application. Despite multiple opportunities and notices, the appellant failed to prosecute the appeal, leading to dismissal. The Court found no valid grounds for restoration, emphasizing the lack of sufficient cause and the appellant's failure to take advantage of indulgences granted by the Tribunal. Blaming the lawyer for non-appearance was deemed insufficient, and the Court supported the Tribunal's decision based on sound discretion. The petition challenging the dismissal and refusal to restore the appeal was ultimately dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115101