<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 525 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115100</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, remanding the case back to the Joint Commissioner for re-hearing and redetermination of duty demand issues related to the clubbing of clearances of goods. The duty liability must be specified under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, with all issues left open for the remand proceeding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 525 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115100</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, remanding the case back to the Joint Commissioner for re-hearing and redetermination of duty demand issues related to the clubbing of clearances of goods. The duty liability must be specified under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, with all issues left open for the remand proceeding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>