<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 603 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115085</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and allowed the appeal, emphasizing compliance with directives, reliability of stock verification methods, and the need for justifications when interfering with lower authorities&#039; decisions. The judgment highlighted the importance of accurate stock determination and procedural fairness in duty demand cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:34:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 603 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115085</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and allowed the appeal, emphasizing compliance with directives, reliability of stock verification methods, and the need for justifications when interfering with lower authorities&#039; decisions. The judgment highlighted the importance of accurate stock determination and procedural fairness in duty demand cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>